2025-04-30T14:36:31Z

---

This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. To gain access to our in-depth coverage and insights, consider becoming an Insider today.

A complex legal battle is unfolding as three different jurisdictions seek to prosecute Luigi Mangione, who is accused of the shocking murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Since Thompson was tragically shot from behind on a Manhattan sidewalk four months ago, Mangione has been charged by various prosecutors, leading to a contentious discussion about which jurisdiction will take the lead in his prosecution.

Currently, Mangione faces murder charges from both federal and state prosecutors in New York, as well as state-level weapons and forgery charges in central Pennsylvania. The federal case, which includes a potential death penalty, poses a significant challenge and has drawn considerable attention. Meanwhile, officials in Blair County, Pennsylvania, have expressed their determination to see Mangione tried for separate charges relating to a ghost gun and a fake ID, which were found in his possession during his arrest.

In a statement to Business Insider, Nichole Smith, the first assistant district attorney in Blair County, emphasized, "We are not planning to drop our charges." She confirmed that her office intends to wait until the New York murder trials have concluded before proceeding with their own case against Mangione, indicating a strategy to streamline the prosecution process.

At just 26 years old, the Maryland native is firmly contesting all charges across the three jurisdictions. Notably, Mangione entered a plea of not guilty to his federal indictment during a recent court appearance on Friday. Following the hearing, his defense attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, voiced her frustrations regarding the competing prosecutions, labeling it the "unprecedented, simultaneous duel prosecution of Mr. Mangione for the exact same offense."

The pivotal question remains: which jurisdiction will take the lead in prosecuting Mangione for the murder of Brian Thompson? Initially, Manhattan's state-level case appeared to hold precedence. Back in December, a tentative agreement was reached between Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Damian Williams, the outgoing Biden-appointed U.S. attorney in Manhattan. According to their informal deal, the state would prosecute Mangione first, followed by the federal government.

However, the game changed dramatically on April 1, when U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the federal government's intention to pursue the death penalty against Mangione. This escalation has raised the stakes considerably, establishing a stark contrast between the potential outcomes in state and federal court, with the latter allowing for capital punishment while the former only permits life imprisonment at most.

During the recent court session, Friedman Agnifilo highlighted the earlier agreement, stating, "We understand that there was a handshake deal between the prior administration and the Manhattan DA's office." She intends to formally request that this arrangement no longer be honored, indicating a shift in strategy for the defense. In response, lead federal prosecutor Dominic Gentile indicated to the judge his expectation that the state case will indeed proceed first, yet he also requested scheduling to proceed as if no competing cases existed, a request the judge granted.

As it stands, both the Manhattan state and federal cases are progressing on parallel tracks, with trials not expected until 2026 at the earliest. The federal prosecutors are currently lagging behind, as they only secured an indictment against Mangione this month. This delay has critical implications, as deadlines for pretrial motions and the exchange of evidence now fall two to three months behind the timelines set in the state's murder case, a gap that may continue to widen.

Shira Scheindlin, a retired judge from the Southern District of New York, shared insights into the complexities of death penalty cases, remarking, "Death penalty cases take a very long time," often much longer than state murder charges. These cases involve a distinct set of pretrial challenges, motions, and jury selection processes that can significantly extend trial timelines. The last federal death penalty case in Manhattan, which involved terrorism, took six years from indictment to a final verdict, underscoring the lengthy nature of such proceedings.

As the legal maneuvering continues, speculation arises regarding whether the state prosecution might be sidelined for years while the federal case takes precedence. Retired state supreme court justice Charles Solomon suggested this is likely, stating, "They're not going to give him up so the state can go first why should they?" He emphasized that federal prosecutors may not willingly allow the state to proceed ahead of them.

As the relationship between President Trump and DA Bragg remains strained, it becomes evident that political dynamics may influence the prosecution's approach. Notably, Trump has publicly clashed with Bragg in the past, particularly surrounding the hush-money case that led to one of the few convictions amid several criminal indictments. Solomon remarked, "Trump's not going to let Bragg go first," suggesting that the competition for media attention could further complicate the jurisdictional dispute.

Furthermore, with the federal authorities currently holding custody of Mangione, the logistics of bringing him to state court could present additional hurdles. Solomon explained that while the state could request a writ of habeas corpus to secure Mangione's presence in state court, the federal government is not obligated to comply. This adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal situation.

As the proceedings unfold, both Bragg and Joel Seidemann, the lead prosecutor for the Manhattan case, are unlikely to remain passive if the federal prosecutors attempt to move forward first. Seidemann's extensive experience in high-profile cases suggests he will aggressively pursue his case against Mangione, particularly given its high stakes and public interest. Mangione's next federal court date is set for December 5, while his next state court appearance is scheduled for June 26, marking critical dates in a legal saga that is only just beginning.