2025-05-01T13:32:15Z

---

In a significant move towards enhancing accountability within the federal judiciary, Representative Hank Johnson, a Democrat from Georgia, has introduced new legislation aimed at ensuring that federal judges accused of misconduct remain subject to investigation, even if they choose to retire or resign.

The bill, aptly named the Transparency and Responsibility in Upholding Standards in the Judiciary Act (TRUST), seeks to mend a critical loophole that has allowed judges facing credible allegations of wrongdoing to collect their pension benefits despite ongoing investigations. This legislative effort follows a revealing investigation by NPR that uncovered serious flaws within the federal judiciary's current system for handling workplace misconduct complaints.

Judges and courts should not be allowed to sweep bad behavior under the rug, stated Johnson, who serves as the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committees panel focused on judicial matters. His assertion underscores a growing concern that misconduct within the judicial branch goes unchecked, thereby undermining public trust in the legal system.

The introduction of this bill is particularly timely, as it brings attention to troubling instances where judges have been able to retire with full benefits while still under internal investigation. Notable cases highlighted in the NPR report include Judge Jos Antonio Fust from Puerto Rico and Judge Alex Kozinski from California, both of whom left their positions amidst allegations of serious misconduct.

Debra Perlin, the vice president for policy at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), echoed Johnson's sentiments, emphasizing that the proper functioning of our courts depends on an accountable judiciary. Perlin insists that it is imperative for the judiciary to thoroughly investigate potential breaches of public trust, and that Congress must act to pass this vital legislation.

This call for accountability comes at a time when approximately 30,000 individuals are employed across the judicial branch, spanning judges chambers, clerks offices, public defenders, and probation offices. Despite the large workforce, the federal courts currently enjoy an exemption from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This exemption complicates the process for law clerks and other judicial employees seeking justice in cases of abuse perpetrated by judges.

In response to increased scrutiny since the rise of the #MeToo movement seven years ago, the federal courts assert that they have made substantial changes to their internal reporting systems. A spokesperson for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts noted that two independent studies verified the positive impact of these changes. In March, the courts released findings from a national workplace study, revealing that nearly two-thirds of respondents reported not having experienced inappropriate behavior in the workplace.

However, the survey's results also highlighted a troubling lack of confidence in the reporting mechanisms available to employees. Only 42% of anonymous respondents indicated they would feel comfortable reporting misconduct, and those who did utilize the system often expressed dissatisfaction with the outcomes.

In an effort to further improve the reporting process, the courts are currently exploring additional changes, which may include provisions allowing employees to recover legal fees and damages. This potential development could serve as a crucial step toward fostering a more supportive and accountable workplace for those employed in the judiciary.